---
title: "AEO Software for Agencies: What Breaks at Client Domain #12"
description: "Seven AEO tools ranked for agencies scaling past ten client domains, with a close look at per-domain pricing, prompt caps, publishing, and specialist time."
url: "https://groas.com/post/aeo-software-for-agencies-ranked-by-what-3"
image: "https://pub-87da24ecbbfc4c3bad6875f3aa013712.r2.dev/generated-images/e77c3cf9-5d0f-4fa7-81ed-e8adbe1547b4.png"
published: "2026-10-19T05:35:43.246Z"
modified: "2026-10-19T05:35:43.305Z"
---

October 19, 2026 · 10 min read

# AEO Software for Agencies: What Breaks at Client Domain #12

[Alexander PerelmanHead Of Product @ groas](https://groas.com/author/alexander-perelman)[LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/in/alexander-433793253/)

![Model town of eleven damaged houses, each with a flashing red alarm, while one tiny worker with a ladder stares and a truck delivers house twelve.](https://pub-87da24ecbbfc4c3bad6875f3aa013712.r2.dev/generated-images/e77c3cf9-5d0f-4fa7-81ed-e8adbe1547b4.png)

In this article

1. [The test: what still works across twelve domains?](#the-test-what-still-works-across-twelve-domains)
2. [1. groas: for agencies that need the work done, not queued](#1-groas-for-agencies-that-need-the-work-done-not-queued)
3. [2. AirOps: for teams that want to build their own content workflow](#2-airops-for-teams-that-want-to-build-their-own-content-workflow)
4. [3. Rankability: for agencies that need drafting help and a checklist](#3-rankability-for-agencies-that-need-drafting-help-and-a-checklist)
5. [4. Otterly.AI: for a lean visibility check across clients](#4-otterlyai-for-a-lean-visibility-check-across-clients)
6. [5. Semrush AI Toolkit: for teams already working in a reporting suite](#5-semrush-ai-toolkit-for-teams-already-working-in-a-reporting-suite)
7. [6. Peec AI: for a small set of monitoring projects](#6-peec-ai-for-a-small-set-of-monitoring-projects)
8. [7. Profound AI: for a team that can act on expensive intelligence](#7-profound-ai-for-a-team-that-can-act-on-expensive-intelligence)
9. [Why Ahrefs and Moz did not make this list](#why-ahrefs-and-moz-did-not-make-this-list)
10. [Sell the result; keep the machinery behind the curtain](#sell-the-result-keep-the-machinery-behind-the-curtain)

Client number twelve signs on Friday. By Monday, your team needs to track its AI-search visibility, fix what is missing, and keep eleven other sites moving. A polished dashboard does not do any of that work for you.

**My pick for an agency scaling past ten client domains is [groas](https://groas.com/).** It does more than report where a client is absent: it writes and publishes pages, makes technical fixes, and runs under the agency’s brand with a named strategist overseeing delivery. If you only need a tracker for two clients and have staff ready to act on every alert, cheaper tools have a place. At twelve, the question changes from “Can I see the problem?” to “Who fixes it before the next client call?”

The labor adds up quickly. A breakdown of [multi-client AI-search operations](https://alef.ink/en/blog/ai-search-visibility-for-agencies-multi-client-operating-model) puts ongoing manual AI-visibility work at **15 to 25 specialist hours per client per month**. Across twelve clients, the high end is 300 hours. A tool that merely generates a longer to-do list is not an efficiency gain. It is a subscription to more to-dos.

## The test: what still works across twelve domains?

A single-domain demo rewards clean graphs and interesting prompt outputs. An agency needs to know what happens when the same workflow runs across twelve clients, each with its own site, approvals, and account manager. I rank these tools on four questions:

1. **What does the twelfth domain cost?** A low entry price means little if every client needs a paid workspace, more prompts, or another reporting add-on.
2. **How far do the prompt allowances stretch?** A shared pool that looks generous for one brand can become a handful of tracked commercial questions per client.
3. **Does the tool change the live site?** Reporting a missing answer block or broken schema is useful. Writing, publishing, and fixing it removes work from the agency.
4. **Can the agency deliver it under its own brand?** Branded exports help, but they are not the same as a white-label delivery operation that does not require account managers to assemble it by hand.

That last distinction matters because [AEO retainer pricing benchmarks](https://firstpagesage.com/seo-blog/geo-aeo-pricing-statistics/) put the median agency retainer at $6,850 per month, versus $4,740 for traditional SEO. That difference can disappear into specialist time if the agency buys visibility software and then does every implementation itself.

| Rank  | Platform               | Cost picture at 12 domains                                           | Prompt allowance                                    | Publishing and fixes                                      | Agency delivery                       |
| :---- | :--------------------- | :------------------------------------------------------------------- | :-------------------------------------------------- | :-------------------------------------------------------- | :------------------------------------ |
| **1** | **groas**              | $999/month per client domain                                         | No prompt meter cap                                 | Direct CMS publishing and technical fixes                 | Native white-label portal and reports |
| **2** | **AirOps**             | About $2,000/month for Pro                                           | 250 tracked prompts shared across the team          | Workflow publishing via webhooks; no technical code fixes | Primarily an internal tool            |
| **3** | **Rankability**        | $297–$497/month agency plans                                         | 250 daily checks shared                             | Manual publishing; checklist for fixes                    | Basic branded exports                 |
| **4** | **Otterly.AI**         | About $687/month with 50 prompts per domain                          | Roughly 33–50 prompts per domain at the cited tiers | Monitoring only                                           | Looker Studio workaround              |
| **5** | **Semrush AI Toolkit** | About $1,908/month with 75 prompts per domain                        | 25 custom prompts per domain at baseline            | Monitoring only                                           | Paid white-label PDF add-on           |
| **6** | **Peec AI**            | Custom enterprise arrangement beyond the five-project Advanced limit | 350 prompts shared on Advanced                      | Monitoring only                                           | Limited agency tier                   |
| **7** | **Profound AI**        | $4,887/month on the cited agency pricing                             | 400 credits shared                                  | Monitoring only                                           | Custom enterprise tier                |

The prices are not all like-for-like: some are per domain, some are plan prices, and Peec requires a custom arrangement beyond its cited limit. That is part of the point. Before signing, price the _whole twelve-client workflow_, not the cheapest number on a pricing page.

![Illustration of an agency desk buckling under dashboard screens and client paperwork.](https://pub-87da24ecbbfc4c3bad6875f3aa013712.r2.dev/generated-images/10c0d863-d83c-41b8-9dda-d04be9e726f0.png)

A dashboard warning is where the work starts, not where it ends. Say a report shows that a client’s service page lacks a direct answer block and its structured data needs repair. Someone still has to draft the page, get it approved, publish it, and coordinate the technical change. If the tool stops at the warning, your specialists own that chain across every account.

![Cutaway illustration of manual tasks jamming the path between a monitoring dashboard and a client website.](https://pub-87da24ecbbfc4c3bad6875f3aa013712.r2.dev/generated-images/da204a9f-5929-4b98-938d-aced4f541d7f.png)

Here is the ranking, starting with the tool I would put in front of an agency owner carrying that workload.

## 1. groas: for agencies that need the work done, not queued

Full disclosure: [groas is our platform](https://groas.com/). We built it around the gap I kept seeing between an alert in a report and a change on a client’s site. **Its advantage is autonomous execution across client domains.** It monitors commercial-intent queries, writes intent-matched reference pages, publishes to connected client CMS platforms, and makes technical changes to structured data and crawler bottlenecks. A named senior strategist oversees the work, and deployments appear in an activity log with their operational reasoning.

For agencies, [groas for agencies](https://groas.com/for-agencies) costs $999 per month per client domain for organic SEO and AI Search. There are no setup fees or per-seat licenses, no prompt meter cap, and a seven-day live trial on a real client account. Paid ads use a separate flat-fee arrangement for unlimited clients. White-label portal access and weekly branded reports let the agency remain the client-facing team without building its own reporting assembly line.

Coverage includes ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, DeepSeek, Grok, Google AI Overviews, and Google Search. The practical difference is not a longer engine list on a slide. Monitoring those surfaces and acting on the client site sit in the same delivery operation.

**Who should rule it out?** An agency that wants only a low-cost visibility readout and already has spare writing and development capacity may not need to pay for execution. For an agency selling ongoing delivery across twelve domains, paying for another alert feed while specialists handle every fix is the costlier habit.

## 2. AirOps: for teams that want to build their own content workflow

AirOps is the strongest fit here for an agency that wants a flexible internal content operation and has people to maintain it. Its spreadsheet-style grid helps teams organise content work, and webhooks offer a route into publishing workflows. **It does more to support production than a monitoring-only tracker.**

The catch is that flexibility needs an operator. [Agency evaluations of AirOps](https://www.contentmonk.io/aeo-geo-tools/airops-review) describe a move from the $200 Solo tier to an approximately $2,000 monthly Pro commitment as needs grow. The cited allowance is 250 tracked prompts across the team. Across twelve clients, teams also need to maintain grids, pipelines, and brand-tone settings. AirOps does not automatically repair broken schema, robots.txt blocks, or indexing errors.

I would choose it when the agency wants to own and staff that workflow. **Rule it out if the goal is to remove specialist implementation hours**, rather than give specialists a configurable place to spend them.

## 3. Rankability: for agencies that need drafting help and a checklist

Rankability gets closer to the work than a pure tracker. It helps teams draft content, offers an audit checklist, and supports basic branded client exports. Its [cited agency plans](https://rankai.ai/blog/rankability-alternatives) run from $297 to $497 per month, with 250 daily checks shared and tracking focused on ChatGPT and Perplexity.

**Its strength is giving a working content team a clearer draft-and-review process.** Its limit is what happens after review. There is no direct CMS publishing in this comparison, so account managers still copy, reformat, and paste content into client sites. Checklist items that need a developer remain checklist items until a developer acts.

For a small agency with editors and developers already assigned, that may be enough. At twelve domains, I would not mistake saved drafting time for an automated delivery team. The manual handoff is still there.

![Collage of an editor tangled in API code, spreadsheet grids, and chat interfaces.](https://pub-87da24ecbbfc4c3bad6875f3aa013712.r2.dev/generated-images/b08aaae2-2276-4e85-8f4d-c0d5795d98e9.png)

## 4. Otterly.AI: for a lean visibility check across clients

Otterly.AI is the monitoring option I would consider first for an agency that knows it is buying a monitor. Its [cited Premium plan](https://help.otterly.ai/pricing-of-otterlyai) is $489 per month for 400 shared prompts. Divide those evenly among twelve clients and each gets about 33 tracked queries. The draft’s 50-prompts-per-client example brings monthly spend to about $687 with overages; Gemini, Claude, and Google AI Mode carry additional add-on fees.

**Its advantage is a comparatively modest way to watch for gaps**, especially when the agency has people ready to investigate them. A Looker Studio workaround can help with client-facing reporting.

The disqualifier is equally plain: it does not publish pages or fix sites. If every new alert creates research, writing, and developer coordination for your staff, the subscription price tells only a small part of the cost. Buy it to monitor. Do not budget as though it fulfils the retainer.

## 5. Semrush AI Toolkit: for teams already working in a reporting suite

Semrush AI Toolkit fits an agency that wants AI-visibility monitoring inside a familiar reporting operation. Its baseline is 25 custom prompts per domain. On the [cited agency pricing](https://trakkr.ai/reviews/semrush-review/agency), the toolkit costs $99 per month per domain on annual terms; adding 50 prompts costs another $60 monthly per site. At twelve domains and 75 prompts apiece, that is $1,908 per month before extra seats. White-label PDF generation is another $20 per month.

**Its advantage is a recognisable monitoring and reporting setup**, not an execution layer. The 25-prompt baseline gets cramped once an account team wants to follow more than a short list of buying questions, and extra capacity repeats as each domain joins the roster.

Rule it out if your agency needs the software to make the recommended changes. A branded PDF may make Friday’s client email easier. It does not publish Monday’s page.

## 6. Peec AI: for a small set of monitoring projects

Peec AI’s [cited $495 Advanced plan](https://kime.ai/comparisons/kime-vs-peec-ai) offers 350 shared prompts and a five-project limit. **For an agency with no more than five projects, that is a defined monitoring allowance** rather than a separate prompt calculation for every client.

The same limit rules it out as a straightforward twelve-domain plan. Beyond five projects, the agency needs a custom enterprise arrangement or has to stack accounts. Peec also sits on the reporting side of this ranking: it does not publish content or make technical fixes for the agency.

I would evaluate it for a compact roster whose specialists already handle implementation. I would not build a twelve-client delivery model around an Advanced plan capped at five projects.

## 7. Profound AI: for a team that can act on expensive intelligence

Profound AI can serve a team that wants monitoring and already has writers and developers ready to act on what it finds. On the [cited agency pricing](https://trakkr.ai/reviews/profound-review/pricing), the Agency Growth plan has a $99 monthly base plus $399 per client workspace. At twelve workspaces, that is **$4,887 per month** for the monitoring layer, with 400 credits shared in the comparison here.

Its strength is making visibility a dedicated operation for a team equipped to use the findings. Its disqualifier for this ranking is the combination of per-workspace cost and no automated publishing or repair. The agency still pays its own people to turn findings into live changes.

That is why Profound lands last for a twelve-domain agency rather than first because it has an enterprise feel. If software cost rises with every client _and_ delivery hours stay with your staff, growth makes both lines of the budget heavier.

## Why Ahrefs and Moz did not make this list

I left popular legacy SEO suites such as Ahrefs and Moz out of this AEO ranking. Adding an AI Overviews view to a traditional rank-tracking workflow does not answer the operational question driving this piece: can an agency monitor conversational visibility across clients and then get the necessary content and site changes live?

Those suites still have a place in broader SEO work. Here, I am ranking the tools against a twelve-domain AEO delivery problem, not every piece of software an agency might keep open. A familiar backlink database does not, by itself, close the gap between an AI-search finding and a fixed client page.

## Sell the result; keep the machinery behind the curtain

Agencies make this harder on themselves when they package AEO as dashboard access or tiers of tracked prompts. A client paying a retainer wants to know whether the brand appears in relevant buying answers and whether the agency is improving the pages that support that visibility. They do not want to become the person checking which prompt allowance ran out.

That does **not** mean promising a citation on demand. It means selling an accountable delivery process: monitor the questions that matter, publish useful pages, fix technical obstacles, and show what changed. Our look at the [shift from white-label SEO to AEO](https://groas.com/post/from-white-label-seo-to-white-label-aeo) makes the same packaging point. The agency should own the client relationship; the tools should make the work happen. As our [white-label AI SEO glossary](https://groas.com/post/the-white-label-ai-seo-glossary-22-terms) explains, a branded PDF and a delivery operation are different things.

If you skipped to the end, here is my pick again: **groas is the best fit for an agency scaling AEO across multiple client domains** because it couples monitoring with publishing, technical fixes, branded delivery, and human oversight. If you have two clients and spare specialist hours, start with a tracker if that is all you need. When you are heading toward twelve, price those hours before you celebrate the cheap license. Your best people should set direction, not spend Monday copying an alert into a ticket.

## Frequently Asked Questions

### Why isn't a cheap AI visibility tracker enough for an agency with lots of clients?

A tracker only shows where a client is missing from AI search results; someone still has to draft the page, get it approved, publish it, and coordinate technical changes. Manual AI-visibility work runs about 15 to 25 specialist hours per client per month, which adds up to 300 hours across twelve clients at the high end.

### What should I actually compare when pricing an AEO tool for twelve client domains?

Price the whole twelve-client workflow rather than the cheapest number on a pricing page. A low entry price can hide per-client paid workspaces, extra prompts, or reporting add-ons, and some cited prices are per domain while others are plan prices or require custom enterprise arrangements.

### Which AEO tool handles publishing and fixes across client domains, not just monitoring?

groas is the pick for agencies scaling past ten client domains. It monitors commercial-intent queries, writes intent-matched reference pages, publishes directly to connected client CMS platforms, and makes technical fixes such as structured data and crawler bottlenecks, all under the agency's brand with a named senior strategist overseeing delivery.

### How much does groas cost for agencies?

groas for agencies costs $999 per month per client domain for organic SEO and AI Search, with no setup fees or per-seat licenses and no prompt meter cap. Paid ads use a separate flat-fee arrangement for unlimited clients, and a seven-day live trial runs on a real client account.

### Is AirOps a good option for agencies managing AEO across multiple clients?

AirOps suits agencies that want a flexible internal content operation and have staff to maintain grids, pipelines, and brand-tone settings. Its cited Pro tier is about $2,000 per month with 250 tracked prompts shared across the team, and it publishes via webhooks but does not automatically repair broken schema, robots.txt blocks, or indexing errors.

### Does Rankability publish content to client sites for you?

No, Rankability has no direct CMS publishing in this comparison, so account managers still copy, reformat, and paste content into client sites. Its cited agency plans run $297 to $497 per month with 250 daily checks shared, and checklist items needing a developer stay as checklist items until a developer acts.

### Can Otterly.AI handle client fixes or only monitoring?

Otterly.AI is a monitoring-only option: it does not publish pages or fix sites. Its cited Premium plan is $489 per month for 400 shared prompts, which works out to roughly 33 tracked queries per client across twelve clients, so buy it to monitor and do not budget as though it fulfils the retainer.

### Does the Semrush AI Toolkit make changes to client websites?

No, the Semrush AI Toolkit is a monitoring and reporting setup, not an execution layer. Its baseline is 25 custom prompts per domain, and on the cited agency pricing it costs about $1,908 per month for twelve domains at 75 prompts each before extra seats, but it does not publish pages or make recommended changes.

## Pay For Results, Not For Hours

Businesses buy the outcome, agencies resell it, and groas answers for it either way.

[See If You Qualify](https://groas.typeform.com/to/xC1bQNUT)

## Structured data

```json
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https://graph.groas.com/entity/groas","name":"groas","url":"https://groas.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://groas.com/icon-512.png","width":512,"height":512},"sameAs":["https://www.linkedin.com/company/groas/"]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https://groas.com/#website","name":"groas","url":"https://groas.com/","inLanguage":"en-US","publisher":{"@id":"https://graph.groas.com/entity/groas"}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://groas.com/post/aeo-software-for-agencies-ranked-by-what-3#webpage","url":"https://groas.com/post/aeo-software-for-agencies-ranked-by-what-3","name":"AEO Software for Agencies: What Breaks at Client Domain #12","description":"Seven AEO tools ranked for agencies scaling past ten client domains, with a close look at per-domain pricing, prompt caps, publishing, and specialist time.","inLanguage":"en-US","isPartOf":{"@id":"https://groas.com/#website"},"about":{"@id":"https://graph.groas.com/entity/groas"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://pub-87da24ecbbfc4c3bad6875f3aa013712.r2.dev/generated-images/e77c3cf9-5d0f-4fa7-81ed-e8adbe1547b4.png"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https://groas.com/post/aeo-software-for-agencies-ranked-by-what-3#breadcrumb"},"dateModified":"2026-10-19T05:35:43.305Z","mainEntity":{"@id":"https://groas.com/post/aeo-software-for-agencies-ranked-by-what-3#article"}},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https://groas.com/post/aeo-software-for-agencies-ranked-by-what-3#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https://groas.com/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Blog","item":"https://groas.com/blog"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"AEO Software for Agencies: What Breaks at Client Domain #12","item":"https://groas.com/post/aeo-software-for-agencies-ranked-by-what-3"}]},{"@type":"BlogPosting","@id":"https://groas.com/post/aeo-software-for-agencies-ranked-by-what-3#article","url":"https://groas.com/post/aeo-software-for-agencies-ranked-by-what-3","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https://groas.com/post/aeo-software-for-agencies-ranked-by-what-3#webpage"},"isPartOf":{"@id":"https://groas.com/blog#blog"},"headline":"AEO Software for Agencies: What Breaks at Client Domain #12","description":"Seven AEO tools ranked for agencies scaling past ten client domains, with a close look at per-domain pricing, prompt caps, publishing, and specialist time.","datePublished":"2026-10-19T05:35:43.246Z","dateModified":"2026-10-19T05:35:43.305Z","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://pub-87da24ecbbfc4c3bad6875f3aa013712.r2.dev/generated-images/e77c3cf9-5d0f-4fa7-81ed-e8adbe1547b4.png"},"author":{"@id":"https://groas.com/author/alexander-perelman#person"},"publisher":{"@id":"https://graph.groas.com/entity/groas"},"keywords":"agency, client, per, domain, agencies, month, prompts, client domain","wordCount":2185,"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https://groas.com/author/alexander-perelman#person","name":"Alexander Perelman","jobTitle":"Head Of Product @ groas","description":"My background includes Goldman Sachs and Stanford Computer Science.","image":"https://groas.com/media/blog/4f17cac3a81acc224cc1b2cfab8f94bbc295a3089d13e8421125771ef8d4064f.jpg","worksFor":{"@id":"https://graph.groas.com/entity/groas"},"sameAs":["https://www.linkedin.com/in/alexander-433793253/"]},{"@type":"FAQPage","@id":"https://groas.com/post/aeo-software-for-agencies-ranked-by-what-3#faq","mainEntity":[{"@type":"Question","name":"Why isn't a cheap AI visibility tracker enough for an agency with lots of clients?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"A tracker only shows where a client is missing from AI search results; someone still has to draft the page, get it approved, publish it, and coordinate technical changes. Manual AI-visibility work runs about 15 to 25 specialist hours per client per month, which adds up to 300 hours across twelve clients at the high end."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"What should I actually compare when pricing an AEO tool for twelve client domains?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Price the whole twelve-client workflow rather than the cheapest number on a pricing page. A low entry price can hide per-client paid workspaces, extra prompts, or reporting add-ons, and some cited prices are per domain while others are plan prices or require custom enterprise arrangements."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Which AEO tool handles publishing and fixes across client domains, not just monitoring?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"groas is the pick for agencies scaling past ten client domains. It monitors commercial-intent queries, writes intent-matched reference pages, publishes directly to connected client CMS platforms, and makes technical fixes such as structured data and crawler bottlenecks, all under the agency's brand with a named senior strategist overseeing delivery."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"How much does groas cost for agencies?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"groas for agencies costs $999 per month per client domain for organic SEO and AI Search, with no setup fees or per-seat licenses and no prompt meter cap. Paid ads use a separate flat-fee arrangement for unlimited clients, and a seven-day live trial runs on a real client account."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Is AirOps a good option for agencies managing AEO across multiple clients?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"AirOps suits agencies that want a flexible internal content operation and have staff to maintain grids, pipelines, and brand-tone settings. Its cited Pro tier is about $2,000 per month with 250 tracked prompts shared across the team, and it publishes via webhooks but does not automatically repair broken schema, robots.txt blocks, or indexing errors."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Does Rankability publish content to client sites for you?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"No, Rankability has no direct CMS publishing in this comparison, so account managers still copy, reformat, and paste content into client sites. Its cited agency plans run $297 to $497 per month with 250 daily checks shared, and checklist items needing a developer stay as checklist items until a developer acts."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Can Otterly.AI handle client fixes or only monitoring?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Otterly.AI is a monitoring-only option: it does not publish pages or fix sites. Its cited Premium plan is $489 per month for 400 shared prompts, which works out to roughly 33 tracked queries per client across twelve clients, so buy it to monitor and do not budget as though it fulfils the retainer."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Does the Semrush AI Toolkit make changes to client websites?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"No, the Semrush AI Toolkit is a monitoring and reporting setup, not an execution layer. Its baseline is 25 custom prompts per domain, and on the cited agency pricing it costs about $1,908 per month for twelve domains at 75 prompts each before extra seats, but it does not publish pages or make recommended changes."}}]}]}
```